The Thatcher Years, an ordinary tale

As part of Margaret Thatcher Memorial Week BULS has encouraged readers to share their experiences of the Thatcher years. One reader shares their parents experiences here.

Margaret Thatcher’s actions are regularly lauded as bold and beautiful by our Tory counterparts. But they were too young to remember those years; and frankly so was I. So I looked to my parents for a bit of enlightenment as to why she is so hated by so many. And this is what I got.

My parents were both twenty years old when Thatcher came to power, and back then the country was a very different place. My mother was to spend the Thatcher years as an NHS nurse, arguably underpaid in London working for a chronically underfunded health service. My father spent a number of years in lowly paid jobs before becoming a trainee nurse shortly before I was born. Their resentment of Thatcher runs deep.

For my father, picket lines were a regular feature of the decade. He joined in the miners’ pickets of the early eighties, and in reciprocation miners came to show solidarity with hospital cleaners over the privatisation of hospital cleaning. Neither group ever recovered; mining towns are still suffering from the death of the industry without replacement, while hospital are now having to be deep cleaned and have “Modern Matrons” imposed on them as a hangover from years of poorer service due to cutbacks and cleaning privatisation. As a result of the cleaning services going my parents no longer had their uniforms washed and sterilized at the hospital; they instead had to wear them to and from work, washing them at much lower temperatures, and picking up germs on buses and tube trains and streets. Any fool can see this is a recipe for disaster; and the rise in hospital acquired infections proved it to be so.

As a Londoner, my mother watched aghast as the Greater London Council was abolished. In one fell swoop the most effective opposition to Thatcher at the time was annulled, and the stunning County Hall was sold off. She felt the effects on the transport system over those years, which are still trying to recover from years of underinvestment. And she despaired as Britain’s first female prime minister failed to do anything noticeable to strengthen women’s rights and status in society.

Towards the end of the eighties I made an appearance in the world. At the time my parents lived in a one bedroom council flat, with drug dealers next door. On one occasion my dad arrived home to find the neighbours climbing out of the window of the downstairs flat below us. They appealed to the council, but due to the big Thatcher sell-off they were told that they could expect to remain there five years, with me sleeping in their room with them. The council stock had been sold and there was nothing to replace it for those who really needed it. It was only when my first brother came on the scene, coupled with a blind bit of luck, that we managed to get a two bedroom council house on another estate.

Major’s years as chancellor were dark times. He proclaimed to the nation that “if it isn’t hurting, it isn’t working” as interest rates crippled my family and we almost lost the part owned council house we had so recently acquired. My father took to working a full day clinic, followed by a bank night shift, followed by another half days clinic once a week, while my mother looked after what were then two tiny babies. I believe she worked some nights at the time too. My father, exhausted, eventually had to stop this gruelling regime over his own fears for patient safety. My parents stopped buying the Guardian to save money and instead a colleague lent them a day old copy of the Independent.

Why were the people who made their living saving lives and giving care to others so under paid? Why were the council houses sold off with no replacements provided? Why were massive cuts to public services made at the expense of ordinary people who used them? It was all part of the Conservative culture of me, me, me. There was no such thing as society, so what did it matter that people were stepping over each other to get that better house, to get a nice white collar job, to save a little bit on their tax money at the expense of lower earners using public services?

These are just some of the memories of the Thatcher years that my parents had; millions of other people have similarly pained stories. It’s not meant to be a bleeding heart tale, or to be an analysis of the merits and otherwise of the Thatcher administration, but its meant to provide a snapshot of how her policies affected ordinary people; and just a few of the reasons why millions of people spent the eighties dreamed of nothing more than “Maggie Maggie Maggie, out out out”.

Cheerio cheerio cheerio

On the 22nd November 1990, Margaret Thatcher ceremoniously resigned from office.  We thought it might be a good opportunity to examine her legacy.  In a guest blog, Ben Whitehouse gives us his impressions on what it was like living or ‘toddling’ under Thatcher. 

I was asked to write a blog post about “living under Thatcher” to which I commented that I was born in Feb of 1979 so it wasn’t so much living under Thatcher as Toddling under Thatcher.

I grew up in Calne which is part of the Tory safe seat of Wiltshire North. Can you picture it? A little Wiltshire market town, rolling south downs, chalk hills, the river marden trickling through the town centre which is dominated by a bacon factory. Everyone knows everyone else, it’s quiet. One of my relatives, Henry Eatwell, cut the Hackpen White Horse in 1838 to celebrate the coronation of Queen Victoria. Fox Talbot invented photography down the road in Lacock. Joseph Priestly invented Oxygen in Calne. Calne had one secondary comprehensive school (good old John Bentley!) and St Mary’s School (notable for having the Jagger daughters attend). The town station was closed as a result of the Beeching Axe in September 1965. The bacon factory was closed and then demolished in 1985 and that’s when the heart of the town seemed to die. People just didn’t know what to do with themselves. The town lost it’s soul and become just part of the commuter belt for Swindon- and that’s a name that just reeks of glitz and glamour.

The 80′s were notable in that I was attending a Church of England Primary school and in my spare time I wore some clothes that now I’m not sure is fashionable or cringe worthy. Reversible tops, day glo green socks and fingerless gloves. It was like we were responding to the bland seriousness of the government. Drab blues and greys gave rise to a technicolour riot in the streets and fields around where I lived.

As I became more politically aware in the 90′s Thatcher had gone but her spectre loomed over the Tory party, section 28, the arts sector on their knees, fear and loathing of Europe, The Tories greatest hits and they just seemed to get greyer and more like the ranks of the undead. The town where I lived was a hotbed of crop circles and UFO sightings (I really hope this starts to explain some of why I’m the way I am), Avebury Stone circle was just a short jaunt up the A4.

I turned 18 in 1997, my first vote, full of hope and promise was a tactical one. Calne being such a safe seat meant that I didn’t want to “waste” my vote. So I popped a cross in another box and stayed up with fingers crossed that Blair would swoop to victory.

My parents still eye me with caution to this day due to my politics. I often imagine my mother shutting her front door after I’ve visited and silently wondering to herself “How did we produce that?”. My parents are quietly supportive of the Tories but read the Guardian and have a gay son- how they’ve not been elected to anything with the Tory party is beyond me. My mother has always threatened that if I ever ran for anything with the labour party she’d attend all my meetings and challenge my every move. Which I’d welcome but I’m not sure you’re all ready for naked baby photos just yet. As a premature baby I can say that most of my baby photos look like some stills from an alien autopsy.

My most vivid memories are probably things she did after she left power- expressing her friendship and support for Augusto Pinochet. All too often I hear supporters of the Tories say that Thatcher was a revolutionary figure who revitalized Britain’s economy, impacted the trade unions, and re-established the nation as a world power. Apologists and those too young to remember some of the darker days of the 80′s and early 90′s tend to over look the fake war, the crucifying of industry in The North and how she manoeuvred like a man. There seems to be a wish to retouch history as she gets older and closer to the grave. I don’t wish the woman ill but I want there to be an honest recording of her actions and hearing 18 and 19 year olds bleat about how spiffing they thing she is makes my blood run cold. Cold as a little quarter pint of milk.

 

Ben Whitehouse

Jon Gaunt on the BNP

University of Birmingham alumni Jon Gaunt has his say on the recent BNP episode and I find myself agreeing with what he says.

Don’t make martyrs of knuckle-draggers

“PUTTING aside the fact that my former employers gave me the boot for calling someone a “Nazi” while simultaneously employing an alleged one in the shape of the DJ Rod Lucas, does anyone really care who is a member of the BNP? So they’ve got ten thousand members? It’s hardly enough to annexe Birmingham, is it? Like an irritating boss or spoiled child, they are best ignored. And mainstream politicians would be better off spending their time making sure that their own policies better reflect the concerns of the majority of the public.

We give these foul and largely irrelevant racists too much credence and if we are not careful we might turn the knuckle-draggers into martyrs if we start sacking them because of their views. Mind you, I do find it funny that some of these misguided morons are worried about their home addresses being published on the internet. I know how they feel. After I had a go at the master race supremo Nick Griffin (what a perfect specimen he is) on Newsnight my address was publicised and I was accused of being a, wait for it . . . a Commie and a Trot! They didn’t intimidate me but I can’t help hoping that they feel intimidated now.

If their policies really are the way forward, why would they want to hide their political leanings? I’ll tell you why, because the BNP are subtly trying to position their party as non-racist and the only ones in touch with the mood of the country.

But they don’t represent me and they shouldn’t represent you. I appeared on the Titchmarsh show with deputy leader Simon Darby, Dumber to Griffin’s Dumb, and he even managed to elicit a couple of rounds of applause from the crowd by playing on their fears. All of a sudden he and the party appear to be cuddly and in touch. But scratch just slightly beneath their ill-fitting suits and the bovver-boots politics are still clearly on show. As we face recession they are trying – like all fascists – to blame all our woes on anyone who doesn’t look like them. But who would want to look like Griffin or Darby?

Banning them will only drive them underground. Instead let us know exactly who belongs to and believes in the BNP. The party will only ever become a real threat to our democracy if politicians remain detached from reality and are afraid of discussing the real politics of living in 21st Century Britain.

Let’s defeat them by debate and by our mainstream parties dealing with the issues that really matter to us all. That’s immigration, law and order and the rights of the decent, hard-working majority coming first over the feral, the feckless and the long-term useless.”

source

To publish or not to publish?

As I’m sure we all heard, the list of BNP members went online this week. Should it have been removed?

While I’m sure a lot of campaigners would like to name and shame, this goes completley against their own beliefs. Sites like Redwatch are condemned for featuring photos and adresses of left wing campaigners; publishing the BNP list is no different. Without wanting to sound sympathetic, BNP members are very resented figures in our society, and as such they are at risk. Not all their members are violent; not all are hardline; not one should be subject to vigilante groups or such. If we are to publish the list, we cannot complain about Redwatch, or any other such site.

Trashing the monarchists…

Tory chair on campus, Dan O’Doherty has set out a defence of the British monarchy.  I was going to write a really long blog in response but I can’t be bothered, so for his benefit –  I set out my views on the monarchy way back in January 2007, clearly the Tory chair hasn’t done his research.

One point has been conveniently overlooked by the young Tory.  How can it be justified that one woman has this power/respect/influence over all of us?  What is so wrong with me and my mates that we can not aspire to such a position of dominance?

That is the only problem I have, and I very much hope I get a good comeback.

Why we blow away the forests.

While I think there are many compelling arguments not to do drugs, from the health risks and the cost of that to the NHS, along with domestic rises in crime, prostitution etc. I have always tended to find the most convincing arguments to be the effect the drug industry has had on the producing, often developing nations. An article on the BBC News website outlines some of the devastating effects that Cocaine has had on Colombia, with Calderon Colombias VP putting it simply, “If you snort a gram of cocaine you are destroying four square metres of pristine rainforest.”

A reason I think this argument tends to be more effective is that from my experience from friends growing up their justification seemed to concentrate around the ‘i’m only harming myself’ or ‘they aren’t as dangerous as the government says’. I also tend to find that those who argue vehemently against the corruption of multinational companies and persecution in sweat shops will not see the blatantly hypocrisy of then going for a line.

Overall though the drugs debate is difficult between those you know as there’s always the risk of losing them as friends if you argue and losing them as friends if you don’t. While clearly it is not a simple good, bad, black, white debate, I still think I agree with Mr Mackay, ‘drugs are bad m’kay’.

Griffin calls former BNP member “traitor”!

As you will have heard, a list of members has been leaked by a disgruntled former party member.  Nick Griffin, chief racist, was on tv this morning – it downright ruined my breakfast.  In his interview he claimed the media had worked hard to portray his members as northerners wearing cloth caps.  So we have another minority group the BNP are quite openly targeting. 

I was also interested to hear him call the Labour Government totalitarian, for banning police officers from being members of the far-right party.  Moments later he used new legislation to defend himself – the equalities act, which prevents discrimination in the workplace on political grounds.

I thought this might be a good story to highlight.

‘W’ – A film review by Oli Jackson

On Tuesday 11th November, BULS went on a field trip to watch ‘W’ a biopic on George Bush.  Here, a new member, writes his first blog.  A review of the film. 

w_poster_3

‘W’ examines the political career and personal life of George W Bush from his short lived summer jobs and alcoholism to the beginning of the end of his Presidency.  ‘W’ is an unusual film, but rather than breaking convention it does more to rearrange and restyle it than anything else.

 

The film is very subtle in many ways, but also overtly politicised or at least feeling a need to clarify things for the audience by creating a good and a bad guy.  Dick Cheney is the latter and Colin Powell the former.  This is especially evident in the scene where Bush and his Cabinet discuss the possibility of nuclear weapons in Iraq and the advantages of invading.   Cheney’s speech about the reserves of resources in Iraq and the control America could gain over Iran is particularly scathing, especially when he says “There is no get out plan … we stay”.  Powell, however, speaks about a small group of extremists changing his country’s entire outlook and policy, generally coming across as representing many of the reasonable American people.  And yet, though it may be exaggerated, it comes across as a very convincing representation of these two characters.

 

The personification of Bush is another quite searing performance, showing him, in his earlier years, as a lazy, irresolute, angry, drunkard, who gained the governorship of Texas only due to his clever speech writer and his personal lust for power.  For most of the scenes involving his earlier years, Bush is either drunk or fighting with his father.  His relationship with his father is actually an intriguing aspect of the film and shows what we’d never see in the media (if it bears any resemblance to the truth, which seems reasonably likely).

 

When with his advisers Bush is portrayed as bad mannered, unaware and largely ignorant.  For example, when he’s handed a draft bill for “enhanced interrogation techniques utilising fear scenarios”, by Cheney, he crassly remarks “It’s only three pages; good”.  It’s also surprising to see how much time the President of the United States of America spends at leisure; casual meals, or strolls, with his colleagues, hamburgers in front of the baseball and long chats with his wife and father, whereas his employees have to work tirelessly to produce speeches for him, without input from the man who’s going to perform them.  This only serves to further contribute to his image of idleness,

 

The worse representation in the film was most likely Tony Blair, but he’s only in it for about two minutes and the film doesn’t seek to examine him in any detail, only briefly showing his opinions on going to war with Iraq.

 

A fair amount of the film is dedicated to satire, mostly in the form of George’s dense and often very literal answers; when a reporter asks “Mr President, what place do you think you have in history?” his reply is “In history? In history, we’ll all be dead.”  There are also many inside jokes and ironies, which hint at what we already know is to come without seeming to do so intentionally.  Though some parts of the film are, deadly serious, like when the woman leading Bush through her garden where a BBQ is taking place, stands …; on a corn on the cob and (wait for it) it sinks into the grass!  My God; the actors do all their own stunts, you know.  Unbelievable.  Another first-class clip is the shot of Bush’s belt for a ½ a second – absolutely excellent.

 

The film does give a good sense of realism, making the audience feel slightly drunk along with Bush, through the camera spinning as he fights with his father or when we don’t see the “trash can” until George drives straight into it, yet the entire thing is so subtly integrated into the film we hardly notice.  The people involved in the events of the film also seem to have the effective look of ageing and generally bear a strong resemblance to the character they represent (with the notable exception of Tony Blair).  Subtlety is the defining feature of this film, it also makes use of symbolism, such as the lights above W as he bows his head to pray just after winning (or so it seems) the Iraq War, very much resemble a halo (presumably the US public opinion at that point).

 

The film is fairly entertaining, but doesn’t go as far as to be gripping.  It sheds little light on how Bush’s mind works or why exactly he acted the way he did.  Instead ‘W’ bears more resemblance to a collection of home movies (obviously much more professional done) from a hidden camera, which jumps forwards and backwards in time alternatively, throughout the film.  ‘W’ is more of a relaxed armchair look at Bush’s political and personal life rather than any deep or serious analysis.

 

Perhaps the film tries to cover too many events in the time available, while still attempting to focus in on the lead up to the Iraq War.  Personally I found the film entertaining, subtly scandalous and fairly relaxed.  I would have perhaps preferred a greater number of serious, in depth looks at events from his actual Presidency (only the Iraq War is given any real consideration out of all the episodes of his time in office) spanning his initial rise to power right up to the present day, rather like “House of Saddam” on the BBC.  However, despite this ‘W’ was still well done, if, at times, giving the impression of being a little exaggerated.

Debtwatch returns!

Welcome back to year three of Debtwatch! Now in the fourth year of my degree, I received that letter that every student dreads: the annual statement from the Student Loans company.

My current total debt is £14038.50, of which £549.58 is interest earned in the last year alone. I appear to be accumulating said interest at a rather depressinr rate of ~£50 per month.

Let’s not talk about the overdraft, and be glad I’m on the old £1224 a year fee…

Daughter of the Revolution

This summer I got a fair bit of reading done. Rooting around in the second hand bookshop at the end of my road, I found a charming little book in an old mustard yellow cover, and emblazoned with the elaborate imagery of the wonderfully titled Vanguard Press. Liking its title, I brought it and gave it a go. It turned out the author was John Reed, founding member of the American Communists, and author of Ten Days that Shook the World; the book was a first edition of Daughter of the Revolution, and Other Stories.

The book is a collection of short stories, inspired by his travels around Europe and the Americas and set across these continents. Most are told as conversations, where the characters reveal their past and present situations to the author. It’s not made clear whether they are fictional or not, but given Reed’s career as a journalist it seems likely they are at least inspired by real people. The underlying theme is of course a cry for revolution; the people we meet in this book are downtrodden, unhappy with the state of affairs and serve to show why the state of things must change. The eponymous woman is an interesting case; her story is a call for a different sort of revolution; one of feminism. Two contrasting stories feature men off to fight in the First World War trenches, one of them upbeat and full of enthusiasm, one depressed and seeing it as an acceptable way to die.

If the book is trying to convert people to the revolutionary cause, it falls rather short. But as a period piece, and as an insight into how the young Reed saw the world, its really very interesting, and tells the sort of stories (if presumably exaggerated and elaborated) that we wouldn’t normally come across from that period.

Recount

I watched this film last night with Kevin Spacey, about the Florida recount in 2000.  Read about it here and I strongly recommend you watch it.  I doubt I’m allowed to give you a link to watch it online, but perhaps you could try googling “watch recount online” it might work.  I don’t know. ;)

And now Clarkson too

So Jeremy Clarkson is in trouble at the BBC as well, for making jokes about murdering prostitutes. Second round of controversey, both involving men making inappropriate remarks about women. I’m not convinced that the outcry is a glowing display of national feminism though.

The Brand/Ross row was centered around the grandfather for hearing things he peobably didn’t want to hear, not the granddaughter whose privacy was invaded. The Clarkson row has failed to mention the stack of lads mags and pornos offered to James May as a prize for doing something daring with a lorry during the same episode, and instead focussed on the offence caused to (mostly male) truck drivers suggesting they murder prostitutes.

Interesting…

Draft Palin for 2012

Some people this evening were praising the end of Palin’s political career.  She will be forgiven for being young and inexperienced.  Exposing her at the forefront of a battered Republican Party will do her the world of good and will help galvanise an equally battered conservative right.  Palin 2012 is a very real concept and one the talking heads are already spreading around.  Matt Litman pretty much started it all early last month over in the Huffington Post.

If – and in my opinion it’s a big if – Obama fails to deliver on his promises and the hope he embodies then Palin 2012 is a massive prospect, and a Republican win is something to depressing to even think about.  I expect her campaign will begin behind close doors over the next few days.

6.30am on the morning the world changed

My sincere apologies, this may just be an effort to keep me awake for a few more hours.  I can’t remember the exact time that the projection was made that Obama had won the Presidency but I do remember Joes Bar in the Guild erutping in hysteria.  I hugged Tom Marley, I leapt on to Dave Borland, I searched for Brigid Jones and in the meantime hugged as many strangers as I could see – many holding back the tears.  Tears were also the theme for the three McCain supporters in the Bar who subsequently went on a rampage to ignite cynicism.

I had been waiting for that moment ever since I heard Barack Obama speak at the 2004 Democratic Convention.  Throughout the morning in Joes, many previous Hillary supporters were going around, heads hung low declaring that it could have been her up there in the spotlight.  That is not the case, no one candidate could ever embody as much the cause of change as Obama.  His victory will send shockwaves the world over, would be believers in the cause will come out of hiding, inspired by his achievements, hoping to atleast make an impact on their own nation’s political establishment.

For Obama embodies Unity, and Unity is what we need in difficult times.  It may become a cliche but we are all one people, whatever our creed, politics or sex, we can all unite together to create the most positive solutions to the problems the world faces.

What a brilliant man, what an awe-inspiring cause!  Well done Obama, and thank you so much for re-energising my faith in politics as the means to the ends of our problems.

Not long to go…

Lots of BULS will be watching the results come in in Joes, our Guild of Students bar, until the small hours of the morning. Every time I catch the news, I get more excited.

George Bush came to power when I was thirteen, and became instantly a big part of my political awareness, embodying to the younger me everything that was wrong with the world at the time. His policies on third world aid, contraception, gay rights, abortion, capital punishment, taxation, foreign affairs, education, healthcare, everything, the injustice of him holding office at all, left me cold; I long ago had to take down my poster of his misquotes, for I couldn’t bear to laugh at someone who had caused such misery to so many. The anger me and my friends felt on the day he visited the UK, and we marched through London, years ago now, still burns up again in me every time he appears on television or in the press. Now, at the grand old age of twenty-one I can see things a lot less simplistically than I used to, and realise that the films of Michael Moore are not gospel; but a large part of that childhood passion is still there. The thought that tonight his successor will be chosen, and there’s an excellent chance he’ll be against everything Bush stood for, is something still incredibly exciting to me, and I’m not even American.

My only worry now is the Obama cannot possibly live up to the hype. But for tonight I am hopefully going to be celebrating with my friends and tommorrow morning be falling asleep happy that the Republican Bush years will no longer be a living nightmare but about to be confined to a dusty chapter of history.

If the World Could Vote.

A friend pointed out this great site where 772,847 from 212 different countries have voted for their preferred choice in todays Presidential Election.  As you might expect the vast majority are all heavily in favour of Obama.  However, some interesting ones are:

* Macedonia where of the 349 people who have voted, 85.1% are for McCain

* Venezuela where of the 970 people who have voted, 57.5% are for McCain

* Israel where of the 723 people who have voted, 64.7% are for Obama.

Most of the rest are landslides to Obama.  While it must be said the site is heavily skewed towards Obama with 79.8% voting for him in the US, (out of 250,532) it does indicate the massive popular support that the Democrat has received globally.

Fancy a Lapdance?

A bit more info here about the situation with lap dance licencing, which I was protesting about a few weeks ago outside Toryfest.

At the time of our protest, only five Tory MPs had signed up to EDM 1375, calling for better regulation of the lapdancing industry. I can report that following an enquiry by the Conservatives and a large amount of pressure from womens groups, a further one Tory MPs have signed up! Astonishingly, none of the Cons MPs are female.

Shame. Did the free night at the Rocket Club win them over?

Matt Strong-ly denies Birmingham Labour Students love-in.

Matt Strong during the Labour Students disco in Sheffield

Matt Strong during the Labour Students disco in Sheffield

Matt Strong, National Secretary of the National Organisation of Labour Students (NOLS), has strongly denied rumours that his favourite Labour Club is infact Brum’s own BULS.  BULS has long been considered a thorn in the side of NOLS and the claim will surely damage Mr. Strong’s personal credibility with his NOLS colleagues as well as his former club in Manchester – who have expressed severe unhappiness at the rumours.

It is alleged that Mr. Strong confronted Tom Guise, Chair of BULS, in a car-park in Sheffield and told him the news.  Reasons given were superficial but nonetheless important, Mr. Strong very much enjoyed BULS’ ability to outlast over 130 Labour Students in the bar the previous night (with Ben Semens, Tom Marley and Guise himself all lasting past 5am), thus winning the strong endorsement from NOLS office.

In a press release from BULS HQ, Guise expressed his keen desire for BULS to continue impressing the national office in such ways at future events.  BULS is making preparations to last passed 6am at the next national event to be held in London in December.

Mr. Strong’s lawyers have refused to comment on his behalf and it is thought that Strong has gone into hiding North of the border.